Thanks for your reply. Will try it out 

Edited to add:

Would Set value = $Piece(obxValue, "<>", *) work?

The challenge is that the text does not follow any particular order :-(

Thanks. Will have a look

Hi @Alex Woodhead 

At which point do we actually specify the lookup table we are searching against in the function? In my case, the table is AnemiaResults 

Hi Luis, thanks for your response. However, the interface in question doesn't have a rule, only BPL. All the routing gets determined by the BPL. 

Thank you @Luis Angel Pérez Ramos 

Hi @Luis Angel Pérez Ramos 
Thank you, the code worked perfectly in the BPL. How can I change it to work in the DTL?

I need to search for the following values "SEDATION:  " and "Procedure" In consecutive OBX 5 and if true set OBR 4.1 = "28014-9"

OBX|028|TX|OP^Operative Note^D4D^11504-8^Surgical operation note^XXX||SEDATION:  ||||||C|
OBX|029|TX|OP^Operative Note^D4D^11504-8^Surgical operation note^XXX||Procedure:

Thank you @Luis Angel Pérez Ramos 

@Arshiya Syeda 
Thanks for the reply. My greatest challenge is how to pull that PV1 7 value given that there are different providers e.g, 'TEST,PROVIDER', 'TEST,PROVIDER1', 'TEST,PROVIDER2', 'TEST,PROVIDER3' etc. so I can not hard code it to only use 'TEST,PROVIDER'

@Ashok Kumar T Thanks for the reply. My greatest challenge is how to pull that PV1 7 value given that there are different providers e.g, 'TEST,PROVIDER', 'TEST,PROVIDER1', 'TEST,PROVIDER2', 'TEST,PROVIDER3' etc. I might be missing something in the code that you sent or might not be clearly understaning it. Thanks 

Thank you @Julian.Matthews7786. I will try your suggestion. 

Thank you @Julian Matthews for the clear and concise response, it worked! Thank you @Arshiya Syeda and @Ashok Kumar T as well for giving me something to start working with.
 

Thanks for your response @LuisAngel.PérezRamos. I should have included in my post that this interface is designed not to have any rules. Only 1 BPL and DTLs. Any way I can use $EXTRACT within the BPL?

I like the idea BUT I still want the original OBX 5 values to be received as is downstream without being truncated and my fear is that by truncating the OBX 5 values greater than 510 characters before passing on to subsequent DTLs I will pass on incomplete fields. Hope that makes sense 

@Jeffrey Drumm please see below. 

Error 1:

ERROR <Ens>ErrException: <SUBSCRIPT>zExists+1^Ens.Util.FunctionSet.1 ^Ens.LookupTable("TestTable","The patient came in accompanied by their daughter.. Time-out was -- logged as '-' number - @''
 

Error 2:

ERROR <Ens>ErrBPTerminated: Terminating BP TestRsltRouter # due to error: ERROR <Ens>ErrException: <SUBSCRIPT>zExists+1^Ens.Util.FunctionSet.1 ^Ens.LookupTable("TestTable","The patient came in accompanied by their daughter.. Time-out was -- logged as '-' number - @''
> ERROR <Ens>ErrException: <SUBSCRIPT>zExists+1^Ens.Util.FunctionSet.1 ^Ens.LookupTable("TestTable","The patient came in accompanied by their daughter.. Time-out was -- logged as '-' number - @''
 

Thank you @Luis Angel Pérez Ramos I used your suggestion and it worked.  Thank you @Jeffrey Drumm for showing me how to set the EXTRACT function. I used $EXTRACT(context.ObxTrunc,1,470) where context.OBxTrunc is the context variable holding the original message.  

In the BPL, I passed the message through the newly created DTL that was looking if the OBX 5 characters(bytes) were greater than 400, if so, I took the substring of the first 470. (I tried taking 480/ 490/ 500 but that would cause the message to error) then following Luis's suggestion, I defined another context variable with the same type than the original message as output. 

This worked! Thank you @Oliver Wilms 

@Enrico Parisi thank you for your response. However, I think it only works if the trace had been set up on the component and not in the BPL. I tried out your suggestion and it didn't work unfortunately as I could not select the BPL in the Source Config Item drop down menu. 

Thank you @Enrico.Parisi. This also worked. I followed your instructions to type in the name of the router since it wasn't appearing in the drop-down menu. 

@Enrico Parisi Thank you, sample message below. I would like that if PMP found, send only the first segment containing PMP and ignore the rest. 

MSH|^~\&|MESA_OP|XYZ_HOSPITAL|iFW|ABC_HOSPITAL|040112043835||BAR^P05|0000000001|T|2.3|
EVN||20200420134725||
PID|||3000222452||DOE^JOHN^E||19931114|M||||||||||1546740|666381774|
PV1||I|BRACKENRIDGE|||||023434|||||||||023434|||||||||||||||||||||||||||20031121||
PV2||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
OBX|||||4100|
DG1|1||784.3^APHASIA^I9C||200750816|A
DG1|2||784.0^HEADACHE^I9C||200750816|A
DRG|640^^APP-DRG S43 (2024)^^^^I10||015|.0944|1.8|1.7|^^0|^^|0|1|1|Completed|20231204085141|PMP, CODER|CODER||N
ABS|||1||||20231204085141
DRG|640^^APP-DRG S43 (2024)^^^^I10|Admission DRG|015|.0944|1.8|1.7|^^0|^^|0|1|1|Completed|20231204085141|PMP, CODER|CODER||N
ABS|||1||||20231204085141
DRG|640^^APP-DRG S43 (2024)^^^^I10|PPC DRG|015|.0944|1.8|1.7|^^0|^^|0|1|1|Completed|20231204085141|PMP, CODER|CODER||N
ABS|||1||||20231204085141
DRG|640^^APP-DRG S43 (2024)^^^^I10|PPC Admit DRG|015|.2017|||^^0|^^|0|||Completed|20231204085141|PMP, CODER|CODER||N
ABS|||||||20231204085141
DRG|555^^PMP S43 (2024)^^^^I10||015|.2017|3.1|3.1|^^97585.77|^^|1358.36|||Completed|20231204085141|PMP, CODER|CODER||Y
ABS|||||||20231204085141
DRG|555^^PMP S43 (2024)^^^^I10|HAC Dx Included|015|.2017|3.1|3.1|^^97585.77|^^|1358.36|||Completed|20231204085141|PMP, CODER|CODER||N
ABS|||||||20231204085141
DRG|640^^APP-DRG S43 (2024)^^^^I10||015|.0944|1.8|1.7|^^0|^^|0|1|1|Completed|20231204085141|PMP, CODER|CODER||N
ABS|||1||||20231204085141
DRG|640^^APP-DRG S43 (2024)^^^^I10|Admission DRG|015|.0944|1.8|1.7|^^0|^^|0|1|1|Completed|20231204085141|PMP, CODER|CODER||N
ABS|||1||||20231204085141
DRG|640^^APP-DRG S43 (2024)^^^^I10|PPC DRG|015|.0944|1.8|1.7|^^0|^^|0|1|1|Completed|20231204085141|PMP, CODER|CODER||N
ABS|||1||||20231204085141
DRG|640^^APP-DRG S43 (2024)^^^^I10|PPC Admit DRG|015|.2017|||^^0|^^|0|||Completed|20231204085141|PMP, CODER|CODER||N
ABS|||||||20231204085141

@Enrico Parisi inserting the break was sufficient on top of your previous response and that of @Mary George . Thank you! 

Thanks @Luis Angel Pérez Ramos 
I tried your suggestion and unfortunately it didn't work. For context (no pun intended), both contexts are set as below:

Will do, thanks! 

Thank you @Enrico Parisi @Kurro Lopez @Ambrogio De Lorenzo 
 

Thank you @Prasanth.Annamreddy. That worked! 

It does, thank you @Roger Merchberger