Maks Atygaev · Dec 13, 2016 go to post

The main idea of the post is .... Just imagine how it would be exciting if we could write the code in such way! :-)

Just imagine that CachéObjectScriptallows to write the code in such way.

You could traverse by the collection in one line! No any auxiliary classes or interfaces or something like that! :)

My goal is show another way to write the code.

Maks Atygaev · Mar 27, 2017 go to post

Yeah, really interesting functionality)

What about execution some kind of command directly from the chat bot?

I mean some kind of terminal directly on your device in chat bot.

Maks Atygaev · Mar 27, 2017 go to post

Thank you for your question!

Now, I think about using Telegram Bots API.

Can you provide some examples or detains about "deploying some services there"?

Maks Atygaev · Mar 27, 2017 go to post

I plan to use little lightweight http server which communicates with Telegram server.

Every action inside Telegram app generates event. The app sends every event to Telegram server.

Telegram server notifies my little lightweight http server about new events.

My server processes the events and do some certain action. For example, restart certain Cache instance.

Maks Atygaev · Jul 20, 2017 go to post

Thank you!

Dear Jiri, I will paste benchmarks info later) Thank you for you request)

My thesis available on Russian language. Do you want to read?

Maks Atygaev · Jul 20, 2017 go to post

Thank you for your attention. Yeah, I heard about mongo-dbx.

About Caché classes ....  I should research why I denied this feature. Anyway thank you) 

Maks Atygaev · Jul 24, 2017 go to post

Dear Rob Tweed.

I plan to researched the issue about using Cache Classes fwith cache.node .

I should refresh my memory why i decided to use programs instead of classes.

Thank you for your attention.

Maks Atygaev · Jul 24, 2017 go to post

Oh, yeah! :-)

It is possible to rewrite the code and compare performance! Good idea to new research! Thank you!

Maks Atygaev · Sep 6, 2017 go to post

Rubens Silva! I glad to see your project! Your implementation supports base things of Functional Programming like Monoid, Functor and etc.

Good work!

Did you try to use it in some real project?

Maks Atygaev · Sep 6, 2017 go to post

Would you mind if I join your project?) I think it would be good experience to me) Maybe we can start to make something interesting)

About current issues. Yes, I understand you.

Why you decided to make your proof-of-concept project? :-)

Maks Atygaev · Sep 7, 2017 go to post

Thank you, Herman Slagman!

Yeah, COS could support more modern concepts and technologies. But we should note that COS supports JSON natively now. It is good step to new bless future of COS.

How you think why ISC implements new features slowly?

I think it's inevitable. I think every language with long history should support legacy and any new feature should be well tested. so... Development team of certain language (even if they really want to implement new feature as soon as possible) have to implement new features slowly.

I think another moment is community state. Maybe something couldn't implement because the community  has no strong wish have it in language ecosystem.

Maks Atygaev · Sep 9, 2017 go to post

Thank you Robert Cemper!

Yeah, COS really has ZZ extensions. Also, you have interesting point of view on Go and Angular smiley

Isn't this enough for thousands of developers that haven't asked for it nor have a need  for it?  

Years ago engineers was happy because they have simplest command like ADD, MOV, JMP.

And now we have a lot of abstraction layers which cover low-level commands.

And I think our programs became better.

Please, don't think that I am disagree with you. I just try to discover the root of... What developers really need?

Maybe. Maybe ZZ extensions is okay. Maybe. Not every cool thing or framework should be integrated into language. yes

Maks Atygaev · Sep 9, 2017 go to post

Thank you for BabelJS. Never heard about it. cool

So, you know, I thought about creating new language which could be translated into COS.

The language have to support all modern concepts like FP, OOP, Generics (Java generics) and etc.

What do you think about it?

Maks Atygaev · Nov 27, 2017 go to post

My point starts from here.

MsgPack is a binary format of data representation.

How we can see on its specification (second link) MsgPack defines serialization/deserialization from common data types and structures into byte array.

I just want to implement the format as is.

When we see on serialization of string then we see that it looks like that:

| code (one byte) | length representation (1 or 2 or 4 bytes) | string bytes |

or for small strings:

| (code + length of string) (one byte) | string bytes |

For example for string "Fringe":

| 166 | 70 114 105 110 103 101 |

Maks Atygaev · Mar 27, 2020 go to post

Hello @Henry Pereira!

I think you created a fantastic tool with a great potential and roadmap.

I think your product is very wished by developers. Thank you to bring and share modern approaches to work with SQL.