Maybe this is well known but wanted to help share.
Consider that you have the following persistent class defintions
An Invoice Class with a property reference to Provider
Maybe this is well known but wanted to help share.
Consider that you have the following persistent class defintions
An Invoice Class with a property reference to Provider
When I'm asked questions about SQL, I like Intersystems staff at the WRC, generally ask about the Query Plan. My feeling is that even before you run a query you should examine the results of Show Plan to confirm that the code is going to give me the results in the manner I would expect. If I expect it to leverage an index and I see that it is not then I go back and look at what I might have done incorrectly and try to re-write the query to get the index behavior I'm looking for. To that end, there's a poll below to ask you if think moving the Show Plan button as the first button would be
I have a DeepSee KPI defined based on %DeepSee.KPI following the documentation http://docs.intersystems.com/latest/csp/docbook/DocBook.UI.Page.cls?KEY…. I've then enabled the KPI on a dashboard by adding a Widget where the data source is the KPI. Currently the ability to show a Detail Listing is implemented by the call back %OnGetListingSQL. This method documents the parameter
pListingName is the name of the listing to display. This is reserved for future use.
I interested on how others feel on this subject. In general terms when you have a class that extends from %XML.Adaptor and you call XMLExport no validation is automatically done as part of the XMLExport process. As an example if you do the following
SAMPLES>S tPatient=##Class(Sample.Person).%New()
SAMPLES>Set tPatient.Name="asdfghjklqwrrrrokkfkljbvkfbjflkbjflkbjblkjblkjdblkjblkcn l nn klkjdfkbjdlkbjlkbj"
SAMPLES>w tPatient.XMLExport(,",indent")
<Person>
<Name>asdfghjklqwrrrrokkfkljbvkfbjflkbjflkbjblkjblkjdblkjblkcn l nn klkjdfkbjdlkbjlkbj</Name>
</Person>